|
Crescent
Beach Spring
|
|
Subsurface
Characterization
|
|
At
the sea floor the spring vent appears to be independent
of the large subsurface subsidence feature. Although their
relationship at depth is not resolvable from the seismic
profiles, their formation is probably a manifestation
of major dissolution (mega-void) within the underlying
limestone. The vent incises the most recent marine sequence,
which suggests that the vent is recent. The north (left)
flank of the sink is higher in elevation than the south
flank (B-B).
Sediment removal from the vent may be accumulating on
the prevailing down-current side of the vent. Another
possibility is that the vent may occupy a fault line,
with the southern flank being a down dropped block. Popenoe
and others (1984) mapped numerous downward flexures
and fractures traces along the northeast coast of Florida.
The reflections within the Hawthorn Group show some minor
displacement. There is some definite discontinuity in
the reflections below the sink (B-B)
which could represent the breach within the Hawthorn and
the migration pathway for the freshwater discharge. At
depth in the seismic profiles the signal does appear to
be slightly more chaotic than the neighboring acoustic
return (outlined with yellow dashed line). This effect
could be from noise in the signal caused by the sink itself,
or it could be a zone of recrystallization or more advanced
karst development within the Ocala Limestone. Removal
of limestone by dissolution may have created a cavity
and caused subsequent roof collapse and fill of the void.
Increased dissolution within the Ocala Limestone would
be the cause and effect of the fluid-migration pathway
related to the spring vent and freshwater discharge at
the sea floor.
|
|
|
|